~*~Warning. ~*~ I am about to rant. ~*~ Warning.~*~ It may involve spoilers ~*~Warning.~*~
I hate it when I can tell a character is unimportant just because of how the author treats that person. I first became aware of this when critiquing a friends novel. He sent the novel chapter by chapter, and I critiqued each one individually.
By chapter four, I told him, “I know X is supposed to be the Dark Villain of Doom, but he feels like a secondary character.”
Turns out I was right. The author knew all along Dark Villain of Doom was really a shadow figure for the real bad guy, a suspiciously well developed secondary character I’d noted in chapter one. >_> (It’s a fabulous book now that it’s polished. I’ve no doubt it will be published one day.)
Graceling, a wonderful best-selling novel, also has this problem. By the time you get to the second chapter you know the king is an unimportant secondary character, just by the fact that there is absolutely no character building scenes what so ever. The only development of the king is by Katsa’s own thoughts and dialog such as “Oh what will the KING say?” “Oh, the KING is so SCARY.”
>.<
A more complex version of this same problem is Alice in Wonderland 3D. The white queen is a completely undeveloped, flat, unsophisticated character in the world. (Who annoys me by holding her hands level with her head in every single scene. Blah!) Watching the movie, I was totally unmotivated to help her, even though she was good. You were simply supposed to take it for granted that since she was the force of good, you naturally wanted her to win.
More confusingly, the red queen was very well developed, and the author took pains to make us understand why she did the things she did. We are then given a token “villain” development scene and a bunch of floating heads, and that’s the end of it. She’s kind toward people who are considered oddity’s. She treats her prisoners well. The only villainy is the frog scene and the obvious frequency of beheadings. (Although the only people she tries to behead are for logical, sound reasons during the movie.)
And while I’m ranting on that subject, not one single character aside from Alice grew or changed at all. Everyone else was deadlocked into the same mind set as before. -.- It was so uncomplex I wanted to cry, because the story itself could have been so good. And before you blame acting…all the actors involved are top caliber. Yes, even the white queen. In fact, I know and love her from several other movies, which is why I blame the writing.
So people, dig out your WIPs and take a good long hard look at your “unimportant” characters. Do they have their own moments to shine? Do they grow and change? What’s at stake for them? Are they supposed to be important in order to distract them from the real baddy? Please. Distract us. With a well developed character.
Okay. You can come out of that bomb shelter now. I’m done ranting.
Aug 27, 2010 @ 14:29:30
I was told by an editor acquaintance not to create unnecessary characters. I had created one and easily removed him. Obviously you are not talking about an unnecessary character in your friend’s MS, since the story needed the character, in which case such a character really was necessary and therefore should have been treated with all due respect and developmental technique. I love the way you put it: Unimportant characters need love too. Thank you for sharing.
By the way, Dragon Psychology is GREAT! I recommend it to anyone that likes being delightfully entertained!
Aug 27, 2010 @ 15:37:46
Aww, I’m so glad you liked it. I’m very fond of that story.
If you think about it, the characters I’m referring to are very important. They are camoflauge for the real villain, and need the appropriate respect.
Aug 27, 2010 @ 15:22:56
Interesting ideas, both in the post and the first comment. Novels have become so Hollywoody that the mere idea of rounding out a spearcarrier is anathema. In the real world we encounter lots of folks–in a novel, if a character is there at all, you know he’s going to be a character with purpose. I’m not sure I like that at all. It gives too much away, and gives it too fast. It also strips the book of incidental graces that should be provided by those characters who flit through in a scene or two.
Ah, well.
Funny you should mention Alice in Wonderland. We have that DVD, and it gets played a lot because teen-aged girls will watch anything Depp-related. My big reaction to it was: It’s Sooo Loooong. And I agree about the Queens.
Aug 27, 2010 @ 15:39:53
That’s a rule that can easily be broken though. The server girl that plopped coffee in front of your MC could be the first murder victim. etc.
Aug 28, 2010 @ 04:53:31
This is a really great post. I agree with you completely. While I would suggest removing any truly ‘unimportant’ characters from a WIP, I think the secondary characters you’re talking about; the red herrings, the foils and so forth deserve their own uniqueness. It doesn’t require reams or paragraphs to give them quirks and purpose…just a little bit of clever planning. Hehehe…that said, in my mind I’m madly running through all the support characters in my current WIP wondering if I’ve given them enough!
Aug 28, 2010 @ 15:23:49
Or just a few scenes in the spotlight so we don’t know he’s a red herring. The book would have been perfect if there’d been a scene toward the beginning with the king showing his scariness and power.
Sep 05, 2010 @ 20:05:41
I really liked reading this post… I have the same issues with characters, be they in books, films, television shows, video games or whatever! My favourite TV show of all time has to be Lost, yet even there it relies on the heavily established main characters… After a while, focused emphasis on the same few people meant getting new flashbacks and characterisation out of them was like drawing blood from a stone, yet there were lots of main characters getting introduced to replace those who died/to progress the plot that could’ve done with being fleshed out! It boils my blood just thinking about it…